The H1B visa program has long been the backbone of America’s ability to attract skilled foreign workers, particularly in technology and science. ut now, U.S. President Donald Trump has introduced a sweeping change: a $100,000 annual fee for every new H-1B application. This decision, set to take effect on September 21, 2025, has sparked debate worldwide. Will it protect American jobs, or push talent and innovation away from the United States?
Traditionally, companies paid around $1,500 in administrative fees to sponsor an H-1B visa. With Trump’s executive order, that figure skyrockets to $100,000 per year, per worker.
This fee applies only to new H-1B visa requests, but it will remain in place for up to six years per applicant. That means a company hiring just one foreign worker could be forced to pay $600,000 in fees — on top of the employee’s salary and benefits.
The official reasoning behind the policy is to prevent “abuse” of the H-1B program. Critics of the visa system argue that some employers use foreign workers to undercut wages and reduce opportunities for Americans.
Trump’s Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, stated:
“The company needs to decide: is the person valuable enough to have a $100,000-a-year payment to the government, or should they hire an American instead?”
On the other side, supporters of the H-1B system — including tech leaders like Elon Musk — believe that the program is essential for attracting global talent and keeping the U.S. at the forefront of innovation.
Large corporations such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Meta are some of the biggest beneficiaries of H-1B visas. These companies might be able to absorb the additional cost, even if it means reducing the number of sponsored workers.
For smaller companies, the fee could be devastating. Immigration attorney Tahmina Watson warns this could be the “nail in the coffin” for many start-ups. Unlike multinational firms, smaller businesses often cannot find local workers with the required skills and depend heavily on international talent.
Legal experts and economists warn that this fee could reduce America’s global competitiveness. Countries like Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia are already strong alternatives for skilled professionals. If the U.S. becomes financially inaccessible, these countries stand to benefit by attracting the very talent the U.S. risks losing.
India, which provides over 70% of H-1B applicants, could see tens of thousands of its skilled workers redirected to other global markets.
Some legal experts argue that the new fee could be challenged in U.S. courts. Traditionally, visa fees are meant to cover administrative costs, not act as a barrier. A $100,000 annual charge may be interpreted as an unreasonable restriction, sparking lawsuits and pushback from business coalitions.
For companies, the key question is: “Is one employee worth $100,000 in government fees each year?”
For foreign workers, options are limited:
This executive order marks a turning point in the U.S. immigration system. Supporters see it as a way to protect American jobs, while critics warn it could cripple innovation and push top talent overseas.
Whether this policy strengthens or weakens the U.S. economy will depend on how businesses adapt — and whether the courts uphold or strike down the controversial fee.
👉 What do you think? Will this move secure jobs for Americans, or cost the U.S. its edge in global talent? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
🛞 Roundabouts Explained in the UK: A Complete Guide for Learner Drivers Roundabouts are one…
Passing your driving test is a huge milestone. However, many learners fail not because they…
What is an IP Address?An IP (Internet Protocol) address is a 32-bit unique identification number…
What is a Computer Network? A computer network is multiple computers connected together using a…
Fire extinguisher types and uses In this session, we will be discussing Fire extinguisher types…
First Aid Theory, Definition, Kit contents, DRABCD, CPR, AED (UK/Dubai) Workplace First Aid Instructions First…